When a Witness Admits PERJURY in Court | Real Trial Breakdown скачать в хорошем качестве

When a Witness Admits PERJURY in Court | Real Trial Breakdown

In today’s episode of The Judges Gavel, we break down a shocking real courtroom case where a university professor was accused of hosting drug parties for students — but everything changed when the star witness admitted lying under oath. During cross-examination, the defense attorney exposed multiple contradictions: • Ketamine use • Cocaine use • Alcohol lies • Perjury admission • Immunity deal The witness even confessed to committing perjury in court. So how did this affect the verdict? Learn how: Cross-examination destroys credibility Use immunity works Prior inconsistent statements are used in court A case can collapse because of one unreliable witness This is a must-watch for law students, courtroom lovers, and true crime fans. ⚖️ Subscribe to The Judges Gavel for real trial breakdowns & legal analysis. #CourtroomDrama #TrialBreakdown #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #LawExplained #CourtroomDrama #TrialBreakdown #LawExplained #TrueCrime #LegalAnalysis #CrossExamination #TheJudgesGavel #WitnessLied #CourtroomExposed #LawyerDestroyed #CaughtLying #ShockingTrial ⏱ 6. Chapters 00:00 Intro 00:35 Police raid professor’s house 02:10 Charges explained 03:45 Witness gets immunity 05:30 Cross-examination begins 08:40 Contradictions exposed 12:15 Cocaine lie admitted 15:20 Perjury confession 18:10 Xanax possession law explained 21:00 Immunity deal motive 23:40 Final verdict 25:00 Legal lessons & analysis DISCLAIMER The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video. Original video: • Killer Cross Examination - Cooperating Wit... Neil Rockind’s channel: / @neilrockind Sources: Articles- https://bit.ly/443YOTi https://bit.ly/4oDS2Lg https://bit.ly/3Y87SD3 https://bit.ly/4pJ7ab8 Immunity- https://bit.ly/3MscG3z Michigan Rules of Evidence- https://bit.ly/3XCJSb3 Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.423- https://bit.ly/4rINciI Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.7403- https://bit.ly/4axOLJX