У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно In Defense of "Child Bride"-The Unauthorized Biography of Priscilla Presley или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Let's talk about the book "Child Bride" by Suzanne Finstad. There are some online that are of the opinion that the book is not accurate nor factual, due to the fact that in the late 1990s, Priscilla Presley successfully sued for defamation one of the book's sources - a man that knew Priscilla back in the late 1950s and early 1960s named Currie Grant. In 1996, while conducting interviews for "Child Bride", Suzanne's investigation into Priscilla's claims about her early days with Elvis Presley in Germany blew Priscilla's narrative out of the water - once Suzanne began to interview Currie Grant and uncover HIS version of events. Shortly thereafter, enraged with anger (and some would say fear) Priscilla proceeded to sue Currie over some heated taped interviews that he gave to the author- both alone, and also in conjunction with Priscilla herself at the author's home. Priscilla took issue with the story that Currie told Suzanne about the nature of his relationship with Priscilla, BEFORE she had met Elvis. This explosive story punched a hole in the narrative that Priscilla had and has been telling in the public domain for decades- one that she famously chronicled in her 1985 memoir, "Elvis and Me." In her memoir, Priscilla says that she was a 14 year old innocent when she married Elvis and remained one until their wedding day in May 1967. Needless to say, Currie does not agree with Priscilla's version of events surrounding the timeline of Priscilla's early days - both with him and with Elvis in Germany. Currie Grant always insisted that Priscilla's version of events was NOT what really happened. In 1998, Priscilla won her defamation case against Currie Grant. However, there is far more to the story. In 2010, an Elvis biographer and researcher named Alana Nash uncovered the details of the once confidential legal settlement between Currie and Priscilla following the lawsuit. What were those details, and why do they seem to protect Currie as well, despite the fact that Priscilla is the one that actually WON the defamation lawsuit against him? The results are eye opening, and only serve to raise more questions - namely- is the carefully crafted origin story that Priscilla Presley created about herself true- or is it HER version of a made up fiction? Let's discuss. WATCH the FULL interview with Suzanne Finstand here - • Hidden Truths: Interview with Suzanne Fins... Sick of all of these crazy news headlines these days? Need a break? Watch my Errol Flynn Slept Here Series - • "Errol Flynn Slept Here" Joan Crawford gives us her life and style tips here- • Joan Crawford Help SUPPORT my channel- my growth has STALLED and I don't feel like the algorithm likes me anymore …. So please - Like, share, and subscribe! Enjoying my videos and want to contribute a small bit to keep me going? JOIN MY CHANNEL Membership! There are different levels, so choose what works for you! (I would so appreciate your support) Just click the "join" button under this video to get started. xoxo Can't join but want to leave a tIp? Help keep me caffeinated and fill my tip jar here - https://buymeacoffee.com/jenniferc Other stuff you might enjoy - I've been a licensed esthetician and a makeup artist for over two decades - Want to see a list of all of my favorite beauty product recommendations? Everything I love, use, and wear all the time - CLICK HERE - https://shopmy.us/jenniferc/shelves CONTACT - jenniferchristopherson7@gmail.com In Christ, Xo Jennifer Commentary Video Disclaimer- This video is under Fair Use: Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. All rights and credit go directly to its rightful owners. No copyright infringement intended. All Opinions are my own and within my right to express under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution