У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Cymbalsmith Diary E13 | Carbon Copy – 2 Cymbals in 1 Go! или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
https://baumgartnercymbals.ch/ / baumgartnercymbals 00:00 Intro 00:50 Hammering (timelapse) 02:18 Moment of Truth I had a feeling this could work, but I didn’t expect it to work so well, and I’m pretty hyped about it :-) I still have to study the outcome in depth, but so far I’m extremely pleased. This may not scale well: the two blanks I used for this experiment are very thin (meant to be made into splashes). But who knows — maybe I’ll try this with bigger and heavier blanks too. Or even with three (thin) ones — I’d love to see the middle one in that scenario, which would be the true carbon copy (no direct hammer marks on either the bottom or the top)! → I’ve messed up the conclusions/expectations as far as shape goes. If I have two curvatures, one sitting on top of the other, it should be: the outer curvature is flatter (but slightly larger in diameter), and the inner curvature is more pronounced (but slightly smaller in diameter). So this means: Bell and body shape (top cymbal): larger in diameter but flatter (in proportion, visually) Flange (top cymbal): more curved, steeper This is basically what I also found on closer inspection. It is also the reason why the bottom cymbal has a “weak” flange (flatter, less steep). But the bottom cymbal has a very strong body even though top hammering was only indirect, whereas the bottom hammering was direct, so I expected its body to be softer/weaker, but it is not. Probably due to the fact that the body shape of the lower cymbal is more curved and pushed more toward the bell (inner curvature).