Why Corporate Affairs Needs a Strategic Design скачать в хорошем качестве

Why Corporate Affairs Needs a Strategic Design

Corporate Affairs isn’t undervalued because you’re weak at the work. It’s undervalued because no one ever designed the function. Operations has an operating model. Finance has an operating model. HR has an operating model. Corporate Affairs often has… a collection of responsibilities that accumulated over time: government relations → comms → community → ESG → Indigenous engagement → social media → AI reputation risk. In this video, I unpack the Architecture Gap—why Corporate Affairs becomes invisible, fragile, and person-dependent, and what a designed function actually looks like. What you’ll learn Why Corporate Affairs suffers from a classification problem (and how “unclassified” work becomes invisible) How the “no architecture” reality turns you into a single point of failure Why Corporate Affairs was never designed in the first place (hint: no forcing mechanisms) The Three Levels of Capability that separate “good” from “durable + scalable” How to close the gap with Eliminate → Automate → Elevate Key frameworks in this video Classification Blindness (Gillian Tett / shadow banking analogy) Three Levels of Capability Level 1: Rational capability (data, intelligence, measurement) Level 2: Process capability (operating rhythm, governance integration) Level 3: Transactional capability (relationships, judgement, influence) EAE: Eliminate → Automate → Elevate Next step Subscribe if you want weekly, practical playbooks for building Corporate Affairs functions that are visible, durable, and board-relevant.