У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно MACT Calculation или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The "Just Compensation" principle in India is governed by three landmark Supreme Court rulings that transformed motor accident law from a discretionary practice into a standardized mathematical science: Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corp (2009): The "Mother of all Judgments." It standardized the Multiplier Table and the percentages for Personal Expense Deductions. National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017): A Constitution Bench judgment that established the Future Prospects rule (compensating for the career growth the victim would have had) and fixed Conventional Heads. It also mandated a 10% increase in conventional heads every three years. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur (2020): Clarified that "Consortium" (loss of company/love) is not a single lump sum but must be awarded to each dependent individually. The Master Tables 1. The Multiplier Table (Sarla Verma) This table determines how many "years" of income are awarded based on the victim's age. Age Bracket Multiplier 6-15 yrs 15 16 - 25 years 18 26 - 30 years 17 31 - 35 years 16 36 - 40 years 15 41 - 45 years 14 46 - 50 years 13 51 - 55 years 11 56 - 60 years 9 61 - 65 years 7 66 years + 5 2. Future Prospects Table (Pranay Sethi) Compensates for the potential rise in income the victim would have earned. Employment Type Permanent Job Self-Employed Below 40 Years 50% 40% 40 - 50 Years 30% 25% 50 - 60 Years 15% 10% 3. Personal Expense Deduction The amount the victim would have spent on themselves (deducted from the total). Status / Number of Dependents Deduction Bachelor (regardless of parents). 50% (1/2) Married (2 to 3 Dependents). 33.33% (1/3) Married (4 to 6 Dependents). 25% (1/4) Married (Over 6 Dependents). 20% (1/5) 4. Conventional Heads (Adjusted for 2026) As per Pranay Sethi, these increase by 10% every 3 years. Base values from 2017 (₹15k/₹40k/₹15k) have been adjusted twice (2020, 2023). Head Amount per Claimant (approx. 2026) Loss of Consortium (Spousal/Parental/Filial)₹48,400 per dependent Loss of Estate₹18,150 Funeral Expenses₹18,150 The Calculation Total Compensation = [(Annual Income + Future Prospects) - Personal Expenses] × Multiplier + Conventional Heads + Interest Step-by-Step Case Study: Name: John Age: 40 years Occupation: Self-Employed Income: ₹10,000 per month Family: Wife and 2 Children (Total 3 Dependents) Step 1: Calculate Annual Income ₹10,000 × 12 months = ₹1,20,000 (One Lakh Twenty Thousand Rupees) Step 2: Add Future Prospects Since John is exactly 40 and self-employed, he falls into the 25% bracket. (Note: If he were 39, he would have received 40%. At age 41, he remains at 25% until age 50. ₹1,20,000 + 25% (₹30,000) = ₹1,50,000 Step 3: Deduct Personal Expenses John is married with 3 dependents. As per Sarla Verma, we deduct 1/3rd.₹1,50,000 - 1/3 (₹50,000) = ₹1,00,000 (Actual Loss of Dependency) Step 4: Apply Multiplier For age 40, the multiplier is 15. ₹1,00,000 × 15 = ₹15,00,000 (Fifteen Lakh Rupees) Step 5: Add Conventional Heads Consortium (3 members): ₹48,400 × 3 = ₹1,45,200 Loss of Estate: ₹18,150 Funeral Expenses: ₹18,150 Total Conventional Heads: ₹1,81,500 Final Total (Excluding Interest): ₹15,00,000 + ₹1,81,500 = ₹16,81,500 (Sixteen Lakh Eighty-One Thousand Five Hundred Rupees) Key FAQ: Monthly vs. Annual Basis A common question is whether calculating by month or year changes the result? It does not. Example using John’s monthly figures: Monthly Income: ₹10,000 Future Prospects (25%): ₹2,500 (Total ₹12,500) Personal Deduction (1/3): ₹4,166.67 (Remaining ₹8,333.33) Apply Multiplier: ₹8,333.33 × 12 months × 15 years = ₹15,00,000 The result remains identical because the Multiplier is essentially a "year-factor." As long as you multiply the final monthly dependency by 12, the math remains perfectly balanced. #MotorAccidentClaims #MACT #LegalEducation #InsuranceLaw #SupremeCourtIndia #SarlaVermaCase #PranaySethi #LegalTutorial #IndianLaw #CompensationCalculation #LawStudentIndia #MotorVehicleAct #AdvocateAdvice #InsuranceClaims #LegalKnowledge #CaseStudy