У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Competence Trap: Why We Choose the Wrong Leaders and How to Fix It или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In the modern corporate and political landscape, a pervasive paradox exists: organizations claim to seek the best leaders, yet we are consistently managed by the ineffective. If you feel your boss isn't as talented as they think, you aren’t alone. Statistics show these individuals are more likely to be male. This isn’t gender warfare; it’s organizational psychology. Men are statistically more likely to be deceived about their own talents. Self-deception is a powerful career mechanism: to fool others into thinking you are better than you are, you must often fool yourself first. This phenomenon has dire consequences. Being unaware of one’s limitations increases the probability of becoming a boss, but instead of fostering innovation, these leaders drive up burnout and stress. A simple search for "my boss is" offers autocomplete suggestions like "toxic," "abusive," and "unbearable." To solve this, we must shift our perspective. The critical question isn’t just why there are so few women in leadership, but why so many incompetent men become leaders. The answer lies in three psychological traps. 1. The Confidence vs. Competence Confusion We fail to distinguish between confidence and competence. We assume confident people possess leadership potential, yet data suggests there is very little overlap between how good people think they are (confidence) and how good they actually are (competence). In some cultures, this gap is pronounced, leading to the joke that the best investment is to buy someone for what they are worth and sell them for what they think they are worth. Because we interpret bravado as ability, we elevate those who are loud and sure of themselves over those who are quiet and capable. 2. The Charisma Trap We are infatuated with charismatic individuals. We desire leaders who are charming and entertaining, failing to realize that an effective leader is not a stand-up comedian. Effective leadership is often underwhelming and "boring." Consider Angela Merkel: she prepares, listens, and makes rational decisions without scandal. That doesn’t make for a blockbuster film, but it makes for a functional country. We often sacrifice stability just to be entertained by those at the helm. 3. The Allure of Narcissism We are drawn to megalomaniac visions that tap into our own narcissism. Popular leadership advice exacerbates this by telling aspiring leaders to "love yourself no matter what." This creates a surplus of leaders who view authority as an entitlement. Because they lack empathy, they act without integrity and take reckless risks. Conversely, great leaders keep their narcissism in check. They worry about their reputation, which serves as a guardrail against scandalous behavior. Elevating Our Standards How do we break this cycle? It requires a fundamental shift in how we assess value. First, follow the signs. We must stop falling for narcissism and charisma, and instead promote based on competence, humility, and integrity. Adopting this meritocratic approach would naturally lead to more female leaders, as scientific studies show women score higher on these specific traits. The goal is not just diversity; it is improving leadership quality overall. Second, distrust your instincts. We like to believe we are intuitive, but our intuition in interviews is a trap. Interviews are often just invitations to project our own biases. Even with training, it is nearly impossible to ignore demographics or attractiveness in person. Finally, stop lowering standards for women. Instead, we must elevate them for men. We must stop asking women to behave like incompetent men—encouraging them to "lean in" even when they lack the talent to back it up. Simultaneously, we must stop ruling out men who lack traditional, flawed masculine archetypes. Progress starts with improving our own competence in selecting leaders. By valuing substance over style and humility over hubris, we can cultivate a generation of leaders defined not by their confidence, but by their capability. #leadershipcrisis #workplaceculture #managementtips #CorporatePsychology #IncompetentLeaders #genderequality #careerdevelopment #humanresources #diversityandinclusion #leadershipmatters