У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно बेवफा पति/ पत्नी के आशिक़ को सिखाये सबक ! 💥 | Delhi High Court Ka Bada Faisla! | 2026 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
क्या आपके पति या पत्नी का किसी और से अफेयर चल रहा है? क्या आप उस तीसरे इंसान (प्रेमी या प्रेमिका) पर कानूनी मुकदमा करके आर्थिक मुआवजे (monetary damages) की मांग कर सकते हैं जिसने आपका घर तोड़ा है? दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट का यह नया और अपने आप में पहला ऐसा आदेश आपके लिए सबसे बड़ा कानूनी हथियार बन सकता है! 🚨💸 In this video, we discuss a landmark judgment, here the Delhi High Court has clarified that if a third party intentionally interferes in a marital relationship and causes "Alienation of Affection" (AoA) , a civil suit for monetary damages can be maintained against them. We will cover: 🔹 What is Tort Law? ⚖️ 🔹 The concept of 'Alienation of Affection' (AoA) and how it works in the UK, USA, and Canada. 🌍 🔹 Why this case falls under the jurisdiction of a Civil Court and not the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act. 🏛️ 🔹 Does the Supreme Court's Joseph Shine judgment (decriminalization of adultery) mean cheating partners face no legal liability? ❌ 📝 Short Case Summary: In the case of Shelly Mahajan v. Ms. Bhanushree Bahl & Anr., the plaintiff (wife) filed a civil suit claiming monetary damages against the defendant (the "other woman") for the tort of Alienation of Affection (AoA). The plaintiff alleged that the defendant knowingly and intentionally interfered in her marriage, leading to an extramarital affair and the eventual breakdown of the marital relationship. The defense argued that under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, the civil court had no jurisdiction. However, the Delhi High Court ruled that a third-party tort claiming compensation for a civil wrong does not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court. Furthermore, referring to the landmark Joseph Shine judgment on adultery, the Court clarified that decriminalizing adultery does not give individuals a license to enter into intimate relationships outside marriage free from civil or legal implications. ⏳ Video Timeline / Chapters: 0:00 | 🤯 Hook: Can you sue your spouse's lover? 0:30 | 📜 Background Story: Facts of the Case 1:24 | ⚖️ What is Tort Law? (Civil vs Criminal) 2:42 | 💔 Tort of 'Alienation of Affection' (AoA) & Foreign Laws 4:20 | 🏛️ Section 7 Family Courts Act & Delhi High Court's Ruling 5:50 | 🔥 The 'Joseph Shine' Defense & Court's Epic Reply 6:46 | 🎯 Conclusion: Can you file a case? 📚 Key Legal Cases Mentioned in This Video: Shelly Mahajan v. Ms. Bhanushree Bahl & Anr. CS(OS) 602/2025 Avneet Kaur v. Sadhu Singh 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4815 Manita Khurana v. Indra Khurana 2010 SCC OnLine Del 225 Meena Kapoor v. Ayushi Rawal 2020 SCC OnLine Del 2481 Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2327 Joseph Shine v. Union of India 2019 (3) SCC 39 If you want to stay aware of your legal rights and understand the latest court judgments in simple language, please LIKE the video and SUBSCRIBE to the channel! 👍🔔 Advocate Atishay K. Prasad 📞 Phone: 9868554525 🌐 Website: www.prasadlaw.in 📍 Office: Chamber 334A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi