У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно This Viral Argument Against Free Will Has a Hidden Assumption или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
A clip on free will has been making the rounds, and it raises one of the most important questions in philosophy and human experience: are our choices actually ours? In this video I walk carefully through the argument that every decision is either determined or random — and why that conclusion is often taken to mean that free will does not exist. But that only works if we define our terms clearly. We explore: • whether the argument is really against free will — or against the will itself • why “caused” does not automatically mean “forced” • what it would actually mean for a choice to be free • the difference between influence and compulsion • whether an “ultimate decider” is even a coherent idea This is not a debate video. It’s a step-by-step attempt to understand the logic, follow it to its conclusion, and see where the real issue is. Because this question sits underneath everything — responsibility, morality, rationality, and even what it means to be a person. I’d genuinely like to hear your pushback in the comments.