У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The School of Life — Emotional Education vs. Institutional Design или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Welcome to Crisis in Perception, where we examine the systems shaping our world — one book at a time. This episode explores The School of Life, introduced by Alain de Botton, as a systems-level examination of how modern institutions educate for cognitive performance while structurally neglecting emotional development. Rather than treating anxiety, relational instability, or workplace burnout as isolated personal failures, this episode analyzes how institutional design produces predictable emotional blind spots. Incentives favor measurable productivity. Narratives prioritize achievement over resilience. Feedback loops reinforce insecurity while externalizing responsibility. When emotional illiteracy is experienced individually but produced structurally, its causes remain obscured. That fragmentation contributes to a broader crisis in perception — where systemic design is misread as personal weakness. 🎬 Watch the Mini Explainer (short visual overview): 👉 • The School of Life Explained — Why Emotion... 🎉 Apple Podcasts: 👉 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... 🎧 Prefer audio? Listen on Spotify: 👉 https://open.spotify.com/episode/3OqL... ❤️ Support the project on Patreon: 👉 https://open.spotify.com/episode/3OqL... Author Support If these ideas resonate, consider reading the book yourself or borrowing it from your local library. Supporting authors and libraries helps keep critical inquiry accessible. Call to Action If you value systems-level analysis like this, please like, subscribe, and comment with books or topics you’d like us to explore next. AI Use Disclosure This content was created using AI-assisted tools for research synthesis, structuring, and narration support. All analysis, framing, and editorial decisions are guided by human judgment as part of the Crisis in Perception project.