THE EXPERIMENTER EFFECT - Garret Moddel PHD #12 скачать в хорошем качестве

THE EXPERIMENTER EFFECT - Garret Moddel PHD #12

Can intention, attention or expectation affect random physical events? In this episode we’re going to be exploring the subtleties of an odd phenomenon the Experimenter Effect, where the expectations of the scientist doing an experiment appear to affect the results measured. This is hugely important for the right practice of science, and for understanding why some experiments that seem watertight methodologically can only be reproduced by scientists who expect the same results and not by sceptics of the hypothesis. Who better to discuss this with than a scientist who ran into this while trying to disprove the the influence of consciousness in a physical system, Professor Garret Moddel; Dr. Moddel is Professor of Electrical and Quantum engineering at Colorado University, specialising in Solar cells, metal-insulator technology and geometric diodes, and optoelectronics among other extraordinary technologies. He also runs a separate psi phenomena lab. He is also one of the former presidents of the groundbreaking research organisation the Society of Scientific Exploration. 00:00 New Solar tech: Transforming the wavelength of light (10 to the power 14 Hz!) into a diode. 01:04 The Experimenter effect explained 01:06 The difference between the effect in Psychology and in Physics 01:07 The control experiment and double/triple blind solution 01:09 Unrepeatibility due to statistical spread experiment results. Humans never do the exact same thing each time 13:30 P value: the odds against chance that what you’ve observed is due to the influence you’re testing as opposed to randomness 15:00 The hard sciences do not recognise expectation and intention as an influence in their physical experiments 19:00 RNGs: Helmut Schmitt and atomic decay Random Number Generator experiments 25:00 1000’s of scientists in a data driven, peer reviewed field of science, in underground labs at top universities; totally unacknowledged by the rest of science 26:00 Dean Radin at IONS, Bob Jahn and PEAR Lab at Princeton University 27:30 Garrett didn’t believe it till he read the literature 29:00 Garret’s attempt to disprove psi by taking minds out of the picture and finding the same effect 45:00 Garret’s ‘Edges of Science’ critical thinking course at Colorado University, where students try remote viewing 55:55 Standford Research Institute’s 1970’s-1990’s military psychic spy Remote Viewing experiments 01:03:30 Jessica Utts: The statistical analysis of SRI’s remote viewing research 01:05:30 The Society of Scientific Exploration - taking unexplained phenomena seriously PART 2 01:08:00 The Observer Effect: simply observing interacts with quantum systems 01:11:00 Wigner Von Neumann and the ‘collapse of the wave function’ 01:15:00 Our intention does affect random phenomena, incontrovertibly in the literature (see peer reviewed papers attached, compare to wikipedia) 01:16:30 Shoedinger’s cat, and Schmidt’s undetermined ‘cat state’ recording 10:30:00 Field Consciousness theory: Important world events like 9/11 lead to a deviation from randomness 10:34:00 Experimenter Effect criticism of Field Consciousness results 10:36:00 Garret’s Psibotics Experiments, taking humans out of the equation 10:39:00 The presence of sceptic observers leads to effects in the opposite non-random direction 01:42:00 Colleague Bernie Haisch, their zero-point patent and DARPA funding 01:48:00 Justified scepticism of the zero-point phenomenon? References: (please note the reported bias towards criticism over support on the wiki entries; the supporters try constantly to re-edit these entries to represent credible support, only for moderators to edit back. Why the need for such disproportional criticism?) Schmidt, Helmut. Paper "Collapse of the state vector and psychokinetic effect." Foundations of Physics 12.6 (1982): 565-581. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/198... The Society for Scientific Exploration https://www.scientificexploration.org/ Dean Radin at IONS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Radin Radin, Dean, et al. paper "Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern: Exploratory evidence of a causal influence." Physics Essays 34.1 (2021): 79-88. https://www.researchgate.net/publicat... Robert Jahn, Dean of Engineering at Princeton and founder of PEAR Labs Princeton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_... Robert Jahn, Brenda Dunne paper, ”On the quantum mechanics of consciousness, with application to anomalous phenomena." Foundations of Physics 16.8 (1986): 721-772. Roger Nelson, Director of PEAR Labs Princeton, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_D... Bernie Haisch’s and Garret Moddel’s Zero point energy patenthttps://patents.google.com/patent/US2... Garret’s paper on recent Zero-point research https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/3/5...