Mom Expresses Frustration at the Idea of Having to Pay Child Support to Her Ex-Husband скачать в хорошем качестве

Mom Expresses Frustration at the Idea of Having to Pay Child Support to Her Ex-Husband

Mom expresses frustration at the idea of having to pay back child support to their ex-husband. They argue that they have been financially supporting their daughters all along and do not have the means to pay back $20,000. The speaker highlights that their ex-husband makes significantly more money than them and questions why child support is being requested now that their son has turned 18. They also dispute accusations of pocketing rental income from adult sons living with them, stating that they do not keep that money. The speaker feels financially strained and is confused as to why the issue of child support is being brought up now, especially when they are in a financially difficult situation. They express frustration at the situation and argue that they should not have to pay back such a large sum of money when they have been the primary financial supporter of their children. Miss Olsen filed a child support declaration affidavit on February 27th, stating that she attached an updated Child Support Order and Washington Child Support Worksheet through the Division of Child Support's website. The child support order from December 2019 had originally included support for three children, but one child reached the age of 18 in June 2022, resulting in a change in the support obligations. Miss Olsen made the motion to address support because she wanted to clarify her willingness to pay support. There were multiple worksheets filed by Miss Olsen, which will be addressed in the arguments presented. The main issue discussed was the court's ruling on the retroactive support up to the point when the son aged out, and the new income values moving forward. Miss Olsen expressed her belief that she should not have to pay back support as she had been financially supporting their daughters the whole time. She provided examples of the in-kind support she had given, such as buying school clothes and expensive shoes. She mentioned taking out loans to provide for her daughters and stated that she did not have the means to pay $20,000 in back support. Miss Olsen highlighted that her ex-husband earned three times more than she did and that they had mutually agreed for the children to stay with him due to his financial stability. Miss Olsen expressed her concerns about the financial burden of paying retroactive child support when her son turned 18, especially since he had not requested support until recently. She emphasized that she had been providing for their daughters and did not feel it was fair for her to have to pay such a large sum of money. Miss Olsen mentioned that she struggled financially, with only $50 in her account until her next payday. She felt that the sudden demand for child support was unjust, given the circumstances of their agreement and her current financial situation. Overall, the discussion revolved around the retroactive child support payments, with Miss Olsen arguing against the obligation to pay a large sum due to her ongoing financial support for their daughters and her financial constraints. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate course of action regarding the retroactive support and the modification of future support payments.    • Mom Doesn`t Want Dad Telling People That S...   Mom Doesn`t Want Dad Telling People That She Doesn`t PAY her Child Support Obligation    • I Cheated on you he's NOT Yours | Child Su...   I Cheated on you he's NOT Yours | Child Support Court