He Sued Her for Trespassing in Her OWN BACKYARD - Attorney Fees Explode to $122K скачать в хорошем качестве

He Sued Her for Trespassing in Her OWN BACKYARD - Attorney Fees Explode to $122K

Lawyer CAUGHT Billing $122K for Simple Property Case - Judge EXPOSES Excessive Fees! Get ready for a legal showdown! This is the inside story of a property dispute that turned into a battle over who pays the bills. Watch as the court dives deep into complex claims of ownership, alleged bad faith, and mountains of legal fees. Will the original owner prevail, or will the other side get the last word? The drama is real, the stakes are high, and the outcome is anything but certain! Litigants List: Scott Jones (Plaintiff) Jennifer Comings (Defendant) The City of Atlanta (Third-party, initially involved) JD Kellum (Potentially, has a financial relationship with Scott Jones.) Kelco (JD Kellum's company) Blazer (From the law firm Robinson & Blazer, who worked with Jones) David Havorka (From the law firm Robinson & Blazer, who worked with Jones) David Huberka (From the law firm Robinson & Blazer, who worked with Jones) John Robinson (Former Partner/Counsel to Jones) 00:00:00 - The Procedural Nightmare: Adding Parties & Quiet Title 00:02:10 - The Surprise Lender: Kelco Moves to Intervene 00:06:26 - "Matrix is Not a Party": Untangling the Corporate Entities 00:12:00 - "We Never Received Notice": The City Attorney is Missing 00:14:04 - The Core Allegation: Did the Plaintiff Lie About Ownership? 00:25:40 - The City of Atlanta's Role: Can They Be Dismissed? 00:41:50 - The Judge's Dilemma: Sorting Out the Intervention 00:51:00 - The $122,000 Question: Transition to Attorney's Fees 00:53:30 - "We Did the Work": Plaintiff Justifies the Billable Hours 01:07:38 - "Profoundly Excessive": Expert Witness Takes the Stand 01:21:50 - Word Salad? Debating the "Less and Except" Clause 01:40:00 - Heated Cross-Examination: "Are You Paid for Your Testimony?" 01:58:30 - The Discovery Dispute: "Going Into a Black Hole" 02:17:15 - "A Special Place in...": Testimony on Bad Faith 02:44:55 - The Second Expert: Analyzing the "Billing Frenzy" 03:00:00 - A Tale of Two Lawyers: Big Firm vs. Small Firm Rates 03:19:40 - The Judge Interrupts: Signaling a Ruling on Bad Faith 03:20:25 - "I Would Hate to Be Named": The Retired Partner Speaks Out 03:41:20 - Judge's Final Warning: Who is Paying the Sanctions? Attorney's Fees: The money paid to lawyers for their legal services. In this case, the discussion centers on who should pay these fees. Motion: A formal request to a court for a specific action or ruling. Recovery of Attorney's Fees: The process of getting the court to order another party to pay one's attorney's fees. Declaratory Judgment: A court ruling that clarifies the legal rights and obligations of the parties involved, often used to determine property ownership. Ejectment: A legal action to remove someone from land or property. Title 13: A chapter of the legal code that discusses attorney fees Ownership: The legal right to possess, use, and enjoy property. False Claim: A statement or assertion that is not true. Legal Title: The legal right to own property, as opposed to equitable title. Amendment/Amended Pleading: A formal change or addition to a legal document filed in court. Quiet Title Action: A lawsuit to determine the ownership of real property, often used to remove claims or clouds on the title. Sovereign Immunity: The legal principle that protects a government or governmental entity from being sued without its consent. Breach of Contract: Failure to fulfill the terms of a contract. Quit Claim Deed: A legal document that transfers ownership of property from one party to another, without guaranteeing clear title. Discovery: The formal process in a lawsuit where parties gather information from each other, including documents, interrogatories, and depositions. Counterclaim: A claim made by a defendant against a plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's initial claim. Adverse Possession: A legal principle where someone can gain ownership of property by openly possessing it for a certain period of time. Moot: A legal term meaning that a matter has become irrelevant or no longer needs a court decision. This is legal commentary for educational purposes only. Not legal advice.