Pretext Evidence: Proving Discrimination as a Federal Employee скачать в хорошем качестве

Pretext Evidence: Proving Discrimination as a Federal Employee

Understanding Pretext Evidence: A Federal Employee's Guide to Proving Discrimination When your agency gives reasons that don't add up, you need to know how to prove it. This video breaks down the EEOC case Gordon v. Secretary of Army (2013), showing how one federal employee successfully proved discrimination through pretext evidence. ⚖️ Case Reference: Gordon v. Secretary of Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0720120040 (2013) ✅ Perfect for: Federal employees facing adverse actions Those who've filed EEO complaints Federal workers experiencing retaliation Anyone needing to understand pretext evidence 🔍 In this video, I examine: The three-step framework for proving discrimination Two main types of pretext evidence How to identify suspicious patterns Using comparator evidence effectively Real examples of successful pretext arguments ⚠️ This video is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every situation is unique. Consult with a qualified federal employment attorney for advice specific to your circumstances. ⏱️ Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction to Pretext Evidence 00:18 Understanding Prima Facie Case 01:03 Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Reasons 01:32 Proving Pretext in Discrimination Cases 02:06 Exceptions to Pretext Analysis 02:44 Direct Evidence Cases 03:48 EEOC's Definition of Pretext 06:02 Identifying Patterns and Comparators 09:15 Types of Pretext Evidence 14:41 Case Study: Gordon v. Secretary of Army 19:21 Conclusion and Final Thoughts 🔹 Need help with your federal EEO case? Contact a qualified federal employment attorney. https://kingramlaw.com #federalemployment #EEOC #EmploymentLaw #FederalWorkers #Discrimination #WorkplaceRights #Pretext