У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Holodomor | Marxist Leninist Myths 2 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Part two of the Marxist-Leninist Myths series. A look into the flawed narratives within Marxist-Leninist justifications. Popular portrayals of the Holodomor famine present it as an intentional genocide, despite much of the historiography concluding otherwise. ML lines have a lot of play by numbers responses to the common mainstream narratives, many of which go far beyond simply showcasing unintentionality and dive straight into historical negation. One source in particular, Fraud, Famine, and Fascism has almost become the Year Zero of modern Holodomor apologia. 1. Population, Sustainability and Malthus, Crashcourse: • Population, Sustainability, and Malth... I also rediscovered a video by Tom Richey seeming to defend it too • British Agricultural Revolution & Enc... 2. Stalin’s Peasants, S. Fitzpatrick P. 65-66 3. “The economic definition was extended far beyond the criterion that a kulak was an exploiter of other peasants; any reasonably prosperous peasant might be treated as a kulak. Recalcitrance was also treated as a criterion for defining a kulak, and so (they) were also subject to repression” “In the second dekulakisation drive, ‘kulaks’ could therefore be found only by making the definition of ‘kulak’ even less precise. ‘Kulak and well-to-do (zazhitochnye)’ were often treated as a single category, and the ‘well-to-do’ subjected to the same penalties as kulaks. It was further claimed that peasants should still be classified as kulaks even though they could no longer engage in the exploitative activities of the past.” Davies and Wheatcroft, Years of Hunger. P 21-24 “Who, precisely, was a kulak—an owner of three cows? Four cows? Criteria could be murky. But centrally imposed quotas forced answers. Naming “kulaks” often involved preemptively denouncing others to save oneself or settling old scores.” Kotkin, Waiting for Hitler P. 114 4. Davies and Wheatcroft P. 321-332 (Also further reading if interested - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/...) 5. Non-Soviet Perspectives on the Great Famine p.449 https://www.cambridge.org/core/servic... 00:00 - Intro 00:18 - The Context 01:06 - The Claims 04:47 - The Thomas Walker affair 07:51 - Fake Photographs? 09:02 - Natural Famine? 10:09 - The Kulaks? 12:15 - Propaganda? 15:00 - Historic Consensus 17:00 - Historic Negation