Why “In-House Legal” in Surrogacy Agencies Is a Red Flag for Intended Parents скачать в хорошем качестве

Why “In-House Legal” in Surrogacy Agencies Is a Red Flag for Intended Parents

When a surrogacy agency says it provides “in-house legal services,” it might sound convenient — but it’s actually a serious red flag. In this video, we explain why intended parents should always have independent legal counsel, and how “in-house legal” setups create conflicts of interest that can put your rights at risk. You’ll learn: ✅ What “in-house legal” really means — and why it’s risky ✅ How California Family Code §7962 protects intended parents and surrogates ✅ The ethical principle of independent legal representation across all states ✅ How to spot hidden conflicts of interest in agency contracts ✅ How Ivy Surrogacy ensures full legal independence and transparency Choosing a surrogacy agency isn’t just about matching with the right surrogate — it’s about protecting your legal foundation from day one. Don’t let “convenience” compromise your peace of mind. 💡 Learn more about safe, transparent surrogacy practices. 👉 Schedule a free consultation with Ivy Surrogacy today. 📌 Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:10 What “in-house legal” means 03:00 The conflict of interest problem 05:00 What the law says (California and beyond) 07:30 Real-world risks and warning signs 09:00 How Ivy Surrogacy protects intended parents