How to Identify a LSAT Argument Parallel Flaw Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 6 скачать в хорошем качестве

How to Identify a LSAT Argument Parallel Flaw Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 6

Learn how to engage a practice LSAT Logical Reasoning identify a parallel flaw in an argument question task from lawhub.lsac.org by highlighting the individual parts of the given flawed argument in separate colors for clear reference and carefully considering the structure of the conclusion to expedite evaluation of the answer choices by focusing on matching the correct answer to the exact structure of the flawed logic in the given argument's conclusion. Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your #lsatprep journey, subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos as they become available, or become a member at    / @myguruedge   for early and exclusive access to additional LSAT PrepTest and LawHub Drill Set practice problem explanations. To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro... to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefa... LSAC LawHub LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Set 6, Question 4: Medical student: Tissue samples from the livers of patients with X, a liver disease, always have the same unusual cell structure, which is never found in patients without some kind of liver disease. This tissue sample does not have the unusual cell structure, so it could not have come from the liver of a patient with disease X or any other kind of liver disease. 4. The flawed reasoning in the medical student's argument is most similar to that in which one of the following? A) Judicial interpretations of a recently passed law are usually closer to the intentions of the legislators who crafted that law than are the interpretations of older laws. This particular judicial interpretation is considered to be radical and the law was passed only recently, so the intentions of the legislators who passed the law must also have been considered radical. B) Apples imported from New Zealand always sell better than domestically grown apples. However, consumers are very familiar with domestically grown varieties of apples. Since the apples in this shipment are not from New Zealand and are not a domestically grown variety, these apples will not sell well. C) A certain kind of fungus grows on every lawn that is infested by moles and never grows on lawns that are entirely free of animal pests. This lawn has that fungus growing on it, so we can conclude that it is infested by moles or soon will be. D) The patented MV-2000 lock is an innovation that can be found only on Bagco products. It is part of every piece of Space-Smart luggage, Bagco's best-selling brand. This suitcase does not have the MV-2000 lock, so we can conclude that it is not a Space-Smart suitcase and that it is not a Bagco product. (Correct) E) The windows that we install in any house that we build come from reputable manufacturers and are inspected for structural defects. Since this house was built by one of our competitors, its windows are bound to be a poorer quality than those in the house that we built across the street.