Jose "Chille" DeCastro's Bizarre 5/1/24 Hearing. Is He Being Kept From Public View? скачать в хорошем качестве

Jose "Chille" DeCastro's Bizarre 5/1/24 Hearing. Is He Being Kept From Public View?

Very bizarre hearing. Again, lets thank Our Nevada Judges for the footage. Please subscribe and contribute to their channel. In this run-of-the-mill hearing in Las Vegas Municipal Court, a number of bizarre things unfolded. First, his appellate lawyer, Mr. Oram, made a "special appearance," meaning he isn't counsel of record for this Vegas case. Chille did not show - not even by remote video. Oram made it clear that he is not representing Chille in this case. Chille didn't have a lawyer, and Oram apparently said that Chille doesn't have the money for one. Hasn't Chille raised a lot of money for his legal challenges? Second, why did Vegas threaten an arrest warrant? Chille is already locked up. He can appear remotely. Chille can't appear unless he is allowed to. Third, why was there a need for Oram to specially appear, when Chille could have been transported or appeared via video? Fourth, Oram said he would notify Chille "by letter" regarding the upcoming and continued hearing date. Why "by letter"? Why not just call, visit or email him? Is Oram possibly admitting that he wants no further connection with Chille, and is being especially careful to keep everything in writing to disavow any claim that he is counsel in this case? For attorneys, once they appear in a court as attorney of record, they are on the case until the client or the court releases them. Oram was making extra careful to let the court know he isn't involved in this legal matter, even though it is just a misdemeanor case for which he has tremendous experience. Again, why? Has the drama regarding Chille and Judge Zimmerman caused Oram to back away, and to conclude the appellate briefing and then no longer represent Chille? Also, with Chille's criticisms of Mee, he is making even harder to find a lawyer. We don't have solid answers, but this hearing raise many questions. None of this legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is expressed or implied and is flatly rejected. I am not licensed in Nevada, and am not offering any legal advice. This is for entertainment only. I reserve all rights, including California's anti-SLAPP laws. I am not suggesting or inferring that anyone committed malpractice or violated any standard of care. This video is just my personal reaction. There can be legitimate and strategic reasons persons or lawyers took the actions that they did, and not as a result of some error.