Corporate Crimes, Impact & Regulation - Video # 4 скачать в хорошем качестве

Corporate Crimes, Impact & Regulation - Video # 4

Welcome to The Justice Center @ DrHalvey; playlist: Green Criminology. The focus of this video is to examine corporate environmental crime and its cultural impact and how to regulate it. Corporate environmental crimes refer to illegal or unethical actions committed by corporations or other large organizations that harm the environment. These crimes can take many forms, such as illegal dumping of toxic waste, emissions of pollutants, deforestation, and illegal trade of endangered species. The impact of corporate environmental crimes on the environment can be severe and long-lasting. Illegal dumping of toxic waste, for example, can contaminate soil, water, and air, leading to health problems for people and wildlife living in the affected areas. Emissions of pollutants can contribute to air and water pollution, leading to respiratory problems and other health issues. Deforestation can lead to habitat loss for wildlife, soil erosion, and the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Illegal trade of endangered species can lead to the extinction of entire species, disrupting ecosystems and reducing biodiversity. Corporate environmental crimes can also have economic impacts, as the costs of cleaning contaminated areas or restoring ecosystems can be significant. In addition, corporations that engage in ecological crimes may face fines, legal action, and reputational damage, which can impact their bottom line. Corporate environmental crimes pose a significant threat to the environment and human health. Governments, regulators, and civil society must take action to prevent and punish these crimes (Kennedy, 2019). Let’s explore the role corporations play in creating and perpetuating environmental harm. Indeed, corporations play a significant role in creating and perpetuating environmental harm through their business activities. Here are some ways in which corporations contribute to environmental damage: 1. Pollution; 2. Resource depletion; 3. Deforestation; 4. Unsustainable consumption; 5. Lobbying against regulations (Kennedy, 2019) Let’s wrap up the session by exploring the importance of corporate environmental regulation and its limitations when it comes to the fight against environmental crime Corporations significantly impact the environment, and addressing environmental harm will require systemic changes in business practices and regulations. Corporate ecological code and its limitations play a crucial role in the fight against environmental crime. These regulations help establish and enforce rules for businesses and organizations to minimize their negative environmental impact. However, the limitations of these regulations can hinder their effectiveness in combating ecological crime (Faure, 2016). One of the primary benefits of corporate environmental regulation is that it sets standards and guidelines for companies to follow to protect the environment. By imposing restrictions on things like pollution, waste disposal, and resource use, these regulations can help to prevent environmental damage and degradation. They can also help to hold companies accountable for their actions and promote a culture of environmental responsibility. However, the limitations of these regulations can make it difficult to effectively combat environmental crime. One limitation is that these regulations are often not comprehensive enough to cover all potential ecological harms. Some companies may find ways to circumvent the rules or operate in areas where laws are not enforced, which can result in continued environmental damage. Also, the penalties for violating environmental regulations may not be strong enough to deter companies from engaging in harmful activities. In some cases, fines or penalties may be viewed as simply a cost of doing business and not a significant deterrent to environmental crime. To combat environmental crime effectively, it is essential to have strong regulations in place and enforce them consistently and effectively. This can involve increasing penalties for violations, improving monitoring and reporting systems, and providing adequate resources to regulatory agencies. It may also include engaging with companies and stakeholders to promote a culture of environmental responsibility and incentivizing sustainable practices through tax credits or other mechanisms (Faure). ---------- References Bledsoe, S., & Pacino, M. (2013). Community Diversity. Faure, M. G. (2016). A paradigm shift in environmental criminal law. Fighting environmental crime in Europe and beyond the role of the EU and its Member States, 17-43. Kennedy, J. P. (2019). Organizational and macro‐level corporate crime theories. The Handbook of white‐collar crime, 175-190. Zehr, H. (2015). Changing lenses: Restorative justice for our times. Herald Press.