У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Contractual Employees के Regularization पर SC का बड़ा आदेश 2026 | संविदा कर्मचारी नियमितीकरण или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
क्या आप भी सालों से संविदा (contractual) या दिहाड़ी (daily wage) कर्मचारी के रूप में सरकारी विभाग में काम कर रहे हैं? 😟 और क्या 10 साल की नौकरी पूरी ना होने का हवाला देकर आपका नियमितीकरण (Regularization) रोक दिया गया है? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने हाल ही में एक ऐतिहासिक फैसला सुनाया है जो लाखों contract employees की ज़िन्दगी बदल सकता है! ⚖️🔥 In this video, we decode the landmark Supreme Court judgment on regularization of contract employees 2026 — the case of Pawan Kumar & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors. (2026 INSC 156). 🚀 The Hon'ble Supreme Court regularized the services of casual workers (sweepers and a cook) in the Income Tax Department, even though they hadn't completed 10 years of continuous service by 2006 as strictly required by the famous Umadevi case. The Court applied the powerful Principle of Parity (Article 14 & 16), ruling that departments cannot discriminate if similarly situated employees have already been made permanent. Furthermore, quoting the Jaggo case, the SC clarified that the Umadevi judgment is meant to stop "illegal" backdoor entries, not to penalize long-serving employees with merely "irregular" appointments. Departments cannot weaponize Umadevi against poor daily wagers! ✊ 📌 Law/Case Discussed: Pawan Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India (2026 INSC 156) — Regularization of Contract Employees | Umadevi Judgment Exception | Principle of Parity ⏱️ Video Timeline / Chapters: 0:00 🎬 Intro: Contract Employees & Supreme Court का बड़ा फैसला 1:00 ⚖️ Facts & The 10-Year Rule (Umadevi Judgment Explained) 1:55 🤝 Principle of Parity (समानता का अधिकार) & Ravi Verma Case 3:12 📜 Jaggo Vs. Union of India: Irregular vs Illegal Appointments 5:06 💡 Conclusion: इस फैसले से अपना Regularization कैसे Claim करें? 📌 Don't forget to LIKE 👍, SHARE with fellow employees 🤝, and SUBSCRIBE for more practical Indian legal news! Advocate Atishay K. Prasad 📞 Phone: 9868554525 🌐 Website: www.prasadlaw.in 📍 Office: Chamber 334A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi