PT 365 Polity, Governance & Social Issues - 6 скачать в хорошем качестве

PT 365 Polity, Governance & Social Issues - 6

For the PDF, join our Telegram group for easy access and regular updates. Telegram: https://t.me/CurrentAffairswithKaushik In this video, we are going to cover the key topics from Vision PT 365 –Polity, Governance & Social Issues for UPSC CSE Prelims 2026. 3.2 PERSONALITY RIGHTS (Page 1) Why in News? Delhi High Court protected Personality Rights of Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev from AI misuse. About Personality Rights Right to control unauthorized use of: Name Image Voice Likeness Distinctive expressions/traits Includes commercial & non-commercial aspects Not expressly codified in any statute in India Components Right to Publicity Indirectly governed by Trademarks Act, 1999 & Copyright Act, 1957 Right to Privacy Protected under Article 21 Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) judgment Posthumous Personality Rights No specific statutory recognition Emblems Act, 1950 restricts commercial use of images of Mahatma Gandhi & Prime Minister Deepa Jayakumar v. AL Vijay (2019) – Rights end after death Important Judgments ICC Development v. Arvee Enterprises (2003) Arun Jaitley v. Network Solutions (2011) Rajinikanth v. Varsha Productions (2015) 3.3 PHONE TAPPING (Page 1–2) Why in News? Madras HC held secret phone tapping violates right to privacy. Legal Framework Post Office Act, 2023 Allows interception of communication through post Telecommunications Rules, 2024 Issued under Telecommunications Act, 2023 Procedure & safeguards for lawful interception Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Section 5(2): Grounds – Sovereignty, security, public order, etc. 10 agencies authorised at Centre: IB CBI ED NCB CBDT DRI NIA R&AW Directorate of Signal Intelligence Delhi Police Commissioner Requires order by: Secretary, Union Home Ministry State Home Secretary Validity: 2 months (renewable) Exception for Press (accredited communication) IT Act, 2000 Governs interception of electronic communication Landmark Case PUCL v. Union of India (1997) Upheld validity of Section 5(2) Laid down procedural safeguards Order only by Home Secretary 3.4 CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF NARCO TESTS (Page 2) Why in News? Supreme Court overturned Patna HC order allowing narco-tests on accused & witnesses. About Narco-Analysis Drug used: Sodium Pentothal Suppresses reasoning & self-control Key Judgments Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010) Involuntary narco violates: Article 20(3) – Right against self-incrimination Article 21 – Personal liberty Involuntary results inadmissible Voluntary Narco Cannot be direct evidence Facts discovered may be admissible (Indian Evidence Act, 1872) Reiterated in: Vinobhai v. State of Kerala Manoj Kumar Soni v. State of M.P. No absolute right to demand narco-test #polity #personalityrights #righttoprivacy #article21 #PuttaswamyJudgment #phonetapping #IndianTelegraphAct #Section5_2 #PUCLCase #itact2000 #NarcoTest #Article20_3 #SelviCase #fundamentalrights #judicialreview #upscprelims2026 #pt365polity